![]() Publishing the official but quashed version numbers, such as the current official v. I’m afraid the Tor developers’ rational for their confounding version numbering is nothing less than bankrupt, as attested by the multitude of insider and end-user respondents here and on other fora.Ĭalling Tor "version 1.0" repeatedly and seemingly in perpetuity is bullshit (please pardon my profane but long overdue rhetorical intensification, since nothing else seems to work). ![]() I recommend using Tor / GPG Suite, please refrain from using untested closed source software which you cannot trust. When it comes to security related software this is no fun and can endanger peoples lifes if they use unsecure software. Macupdate should really reconsider the entire voting system for similar software. ![]() Hard to proove but the pattern behind this is really strange.Īgain TrueCrypt (unsecure) and Cryptix (can not be trusted and seems to use weak security) are up-voted. "WARNING: Using TrueCrypt is not secure as it may contain unfixed security issues."Ĭombine those two and that makes me really think if we have a person on someone's payroll upvoting unsecure software. TrueCrypt just shut down operations saying it was unsecure to be used: Someone is up-voting TrueCrypt and Cryptix.Ĭryptix is closed source and close source crypto is really hard to be trusted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |